Contraception Confusion: Why Casey and Colleagues Have It Wrong

American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):40 - 41 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 7, Page 40-41, July 2012

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Victims of Abortion and “Victims” of Contraception.Patrick A. Tully - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:383-398.
Can the Potentiality Argument Survive the Contraception Reduction?Phil Gosselin - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:437-458.
What's wrong with confusion?Hilary Bok - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):25 – 26.
Conscientious objection and emergency contraception.Robert F. Card - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):8 – 14.
Emergency Contraception and Conscientious Objection.J. Paul Kelleher - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (3):290-304.
Sport Is Arbitrary, and That's OK.Dan O'Connor & Ishan Dasgupta - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):30 - 31.
Where Are the Midwives?Barbara Katz Rothman - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):56 - 58.
Relational Autonomy on the Cutting Edge.Suze Berkhout - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):59 - 61.
When 'Emergency Contraception' is Neither.Timothy F. Murphy - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):7-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-15

Downloads
29 (#536,973)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations