South African Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):236-246 (2003)
Abstract |
In this article the validity of transferring the Principle of Double Effect from the just war tradition to the domain of business is critically reviewed. If a case can be built for sufficient analogies between war and business, the principle of double effect can legitimately be transferred from war to business. If, on the other hand it can be shown that there are aspects in which business differs substantially from just war, then the transfer to business of a principle developed within the context of war becomes more problematic. After exploring the nature of arguments of analogy and fallacious arguments of weak analogy some important disanalogies between war and business are highlighted. Given these disanalogies it is then contended that the just war background of the Principle of Double Effect had some bearing on both the content and manner of application of the Principle of Double Effect. Finally it is argued that these disanalogies require some revisions to the Principle of Double Effect with regard to both its content and its manner of application before it can be applied meaningfully to foreseeable negative side-effects of business. S. Afr. J. Philos. Vol.22(3) 2003: 236–246
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.4314/sajpem.v22i3.31372 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ethical Decision-Making: A Case for the Triple Font Theory.Surendra Arjoon - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 71 (4):395-410.
Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-Disciplinary Guide.Marcello Guarini, Amy Butchart, Paul Simard Smith & Andrei Moldovan - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (2):84-197.
Knowing, Anticipating, Even Facilitating but Still Not Intending: Another Challenge to Double Effect Reasoning.S. Duckett - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (1):33-37.
Teaching Business Ethics Through Popular Feature Films: An Experiential Approach.Edward J. O’Boyle & Luca Sandonà - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (3):329-340.
View all 8 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Separation of Conjoined Twins and the Principle of Double Effect.David Wenkel - 2006 - Christian Bioethics 12 (3):291-300.
An Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect.Joseph Mangan - 1949 - Theological Studies 10:41-61.
How Important is the Doctrine of Double Effect for Moral Theology? Contextualizing the Controversy.J. Berkman - 1997 - Christian Bioethics 3 (2):89-114.
The Principle of Double Effect as a Guide for Medical Decision-Making.Georg Spielthenner - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):465-473.
The Doctrine of Double Effect, Deadly Drugs, and Business Ethics.Lawrence Masek - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (2):483-495.
Deception and the Principle of Double Effect.Amnon Goldworth - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (4):471-472.
The Accomplishment of Plans: A New Version of the Principle of Double Effect.Alexander R. Pruss - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (1):49-69.
Intending Harm, Foreseeing Harm, and Failures of the Will.David McCarthy - 2002 - Noûs 36 (4):622–642.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Creed, Cult, Code and Business Ethics.Thomas F. McMahon - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (6):453 - 463.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-12-01
Total views
22 ( #515,459 of 2,518,446 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,446 )
2013-12-01
Total views
22 ( #515,459 of 2,518,446 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,446 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads