A strategy for improving and integrating biomedical ontologies

In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA. pp. 639-643 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The integration of biomedical terminologies is indispensable to the process of information integration. When terminologies are linked merely through the alignment of their leaf terms, however, differences in context and ontological structure are ignored. Making use of the SNAP and SPAN ontologies, we show how three reference domain ontologies can be integrated at a higher level, through what we shall call the OBR framework (for: Ontology of Biomedical Reality). OBR is designed to facilitate inference across the boundaries of domain ontologies in anatomy, physiology and pathology.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-05

Downloads
320 (#45,770)

6 months
29 (#69,251)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barry Smith
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

HL7 RIM: An incoherent standard.Barry Smith & Werner Ceusters - 2006 - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 124 (Proceedings of MIE 2006):133–138.
Biomedical Ontologies.Barry Smith - 2023 - In Peter Elkin (ed.), Terminology, Ontology and their Implementations. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. pp. 125-169.
On carcinomas and other pathological entities.Barry Smith, Anand Kumar, Werner Ceusters & Cornelius Rosse - 2005 - Comparative and Functional Genomics 6 (7/8):379–387.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references