A critique of the new comparative economics


We examine the “new comparative economics” as proposed by Djankov et al. (2003) and their use of the concept of an institutional possibilities frontier. While we agree with their general argument that one must consider a variety of institutions and their respective social costs, including legal systems and cultural characteristics, when comparing the performance of different economic systems, we find various complications and difficulties with the framework they propose. We propose that a broader study of clusters of institutions and such newly emerging forms as the new traditional economy may be better suited as ways to approach the study of comparative economics in the era after the breakdown of the old comparison of market capitalism and command socialism that came to an end with the breakup of the Soviet Union.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The legal foundations of micro-institutional performance: a heterodox law & economics approach.Sarah S. Klammer - 2022 - Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Edited by Eric A. Scorsone.
What Have We Learned from the Collapse of Communism?Peter J. Boettke & Olga Nicoara - 2015 - In Peter J. Boettke & Christopher J. Coyne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics. Oxford University Press USA.
Economic ethics and institutional change.Antonio Argandoña - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):191-201.


Added to PP

1 (#1,913,683)

6 months
20 (#139,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references