This paper reconstructs the account of concept formation developed in the 4th Century A.D. by Themistius in the most ancient extant commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. Themistius’ account can be contrasted with two widespread modern interpretations of Aristotle. Unlike psychological empiricists, Themistius ascribes an active role in concept formation to our innate capacity of understanding. Unlike intuitionists, he would not be satisfied by saying that νοῦς “intuits” or “spots” concepts. Rather, the question is what makes our νοῦς capable of “finding” and “recognizing” concepts in experience, and this can only be an understanding prior to all experience. Themistius seems to be responding here to Platonist arguments against Aristotle’s epistemology: postulating a “potential νοῦς” is not enough, for one can apply Meno’s dilemma to it and ask how it can recognize that it has found what it was looking for. But, contrary to the judgment of some modern scholars, Themistius never embraced the theory of recollection either. He argued that both empiricism and Platonist innatism are wrong and developed a middle path marked by a strong interdependence between the perceptive and the rational capacity. This holds for all rational learning, and concept formation is its first stage: to form a concept means to learn something genuinely new, but also to recognize it as falling, e. g., under one of the ten categories. While being presented as a mere “paraphrasis” of Aristotle’s words, Themistius’ account is a well-advised and original response to the epistemological debates of his time.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/agph-2018-0051
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aristotle.Jonathan Barnes - 1975 - In R. M. Hare, Jonathan Barnes & Henry Chadwick (eds.), Founders of Thought. Oxford University Press.
Aristotle.L. D. Dowdall, J. A. Smith & W. D. Ross - 1910 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 30 (8):386.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Themistius’ Paraphrase of Posterior Analytics 71a17-B8.Martin Achard - 2008 - Laval Théologique et Philosophique 64 (1):19-34.
Themistius on Concept Acquisition and Knowledge of Essences.Myrna Gabbe - 2010 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (3):215-235.
Aquinas and Themistius on Intellect.Lorelle Lamascus - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:255-273.
Aquinas and Themistius on Intellect.Lorelle Lamascus - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:255-273.
Themistius and the Imperial Court.John Vanderspoel - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Themistius and the Imperial Court.John Vander Spoel - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Themistius on Evil.Guy Guldentops - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (2):189-208.


Added to PP index

Total views
2 ( #1,447,603 of 2,506,443 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,420 of 2,506,443 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes