Interpolation in fragments of classical linear logic

Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):419-444 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We study interpolation for elementary fragments of classical linear logic. Unlike in intuitionistic logic (see [Renardel de Lavalette, 1989]) there are fragments in linear logic for which interpolation does not hold. We prove interpolation for a lot of fragments and refute it for the multiplicative fragment (→, +), using proof nets and quantum graphs. We give a separate proof for the fragment with implication and product, but without the structural rule of permutation. This is nearly the Lambek calculus. There is an appendix explaining what quantum graphs are and how they relate to proof nets

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#486,401)

6 months
15 (#143,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Interpolation via translations.João Rasga, Walter Carnielli & Cristina Sernadas - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (5):515-534.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The structure of multiplicatives.Vincent Danos & Laurent Regnier - 1989 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 28 (3):181-203.

Add more references