In Mortimer Sellers & Stephan Kirste (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer (forthcoming)

James Dominic Rooney, OP
Hong Kong Baptist University
[Encyclopedia entry] Born in Italy in 1225, and despite a relatively short career that ended around 50 years later in 1274, Thomas Aquinas went on to become one of the most influential medieval thinkers on political and legal questions. Aquinas was educated at both Cologne and Paris, later taking up (after some controversy) a chair as regent master in theology at the University of Paris, where he taught during two separate periods (1256-1259, 1269-1272). In the intermediate period he helped establish a studium for his Order in Rome, beginning work on the Summa Theologiae, the masterwork for which he is still well-known. Subsequent to an experience (traditionally, a vision) Aquinas had on the feast of St. Nicholas in 1273, Aquinas intentionally refrained from further work on that text, so that it remained incomplete at the time of his death a year later in 1274. Apart from his own contributions, the Thomistic school – including followers within and without the Dominican Order to which Aquinas belonged – has had profound and far-reaching influence upon the history of legal thought in the West. Many of the classical developments of Thomistic thought are written as commentaries on the Summa Theologiae (hereafter, ST), including the works of Tomasso de Vio (Cajetan) and those of Domingo Banez, Francisco de Vitoria, Bartholome de las Casas, and the other highly influential members of the School of Salamanca who are noteworthy for developing Aquinas’ political and legal thought in the 16th century. Specifically, the ways in which Aquinas synthesized classical political and legal themes around the law, morality, and the common good provided a touchstone for what has come to be called ‘natural law jurisprudence.’ Natural law thinkers, in short, appeal to objective facts about what is good for human beings, and the social or political nature of the kind of creatures that we are, as a standard against which we measure the legal and social institutions created by human institutions. What is crucial here is that facts about human beings as social animals constitute reasons for individuals and groups to act or be structured in certain ways, such that ‘nature’ is the proper source for jurisprudential and political principles.
Keywords thomas aquinas  natural law  law  politics  judges
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Thomas Aquinas.[author unknown] - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Thomas Aquinas.Christopher M. Brown - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Thomas Aquinas.Christopher M. Brown - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics.Paul J. Weithman - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (3):638-640.
St. Thomas Aquinas 1274-1974. [REVIEW]M. K. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 29 (1):142-142.
Natural Law in Aquinas and Suarez.Sean Coyle - 2017 - Jurisprudence 8 (2):319-341.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #636,416 of 2,507,887 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #48,294 of 2,507,887 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes