The Bias Paradox in Feminist Standpoint Epistemology

Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (1):125-136 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1353/epi.0.0006

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The bias paradox in feminist standpoint epistemology.Kristina Rolin - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):125-136.
Feminist Epistemology and American Pragmatism: Dewey and Quine.Alexandra L. Shuford - 2010 - Continuum.
The bias paradox: Why it's not just for feminists anymore.Deborah K. Heikes - 2004 - Synthese 138 (3):315 - 335.
Is Standpoint Theory a Resource for Feminist Epistemology? An Introduction.Sharon Crasnow - 2009 - Hypatia 24 (4):189 - 192.
Incorporating feminist standpoint theory.Kristoffer Ahlstrom - 2005 - SATS 6 (2):79-92.
Illusions of Paradox: A Feminist Epistemology Naturalized.Richmond Campbell - 1998 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Feminist Standpoint Theory as a Form of Naturalist Epistemology.Catherine Hundleby - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Feminist politics and epistemology: The standpoint of women.Alison M. Jaggar - 2004 - In Sandra G. Harding (ed.), The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge. pp. 55--66.
Altogether Now: A Virtue-Theoretic Approach to Pluralism in Feminist Epistemology in.Nancy Daukas - 2011 - In Heidi Grasswick (ed.), Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge.
Scientific knowledge and its situatedness versus its objectivity (problems of situated knowledge in feminist epistemology).E. Farkasova - 2002 - Filozofia 57 (6):383-392.
Privileged standpoints/reliable processes.Kourken Michaelian - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (1):65-98.
Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Cornell University Press, 1992.Nancy J. Hirschmann - 1992 - Cornell University Press.
Feminist epistemology: Implications for philosophy of science.Cassandra L. Pinnick - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (4):646-657.
Standpoint as an epistemological/methodological strategic?E. Farkasova - 2005 - Filozofia 60 (6):399-411.
Standpoint Epistemology Without the “Standpoint”?: An Examination of Epistemic Privilege and Epistemic Authority.Marianne Janack - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (2):125-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristina Rolin
Tampere University

Citations of this work

Epistemic Courage.Jonathan Ichikawa - 2024 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sins of Inquiry: How to Criticize Scientific Pursuits.Marina DiMarco & Kareem Khalifa - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92 (C):86-96.
Default privilege and bad lots: Underconsideration and explanatory inference.Kareem Khalifa - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):91 – 105.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Why standpoint matters.Alison Wylie - 2003 - In Robert Figueroa & Sandra G. Harding (eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Routledge. pp. 26--48.

View all 8 references / Add more references