Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science‐related Issues

, &
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):349-358 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay describes the value and validity of public dialogue on science?related issues. We define what is meant by ?dialogue?, the context within which dialogue takes place in relation to science, and the purposes of dialogue. We introduce a model to describe and analyse the practice of dialogue, at different stages in the development of science, its applications and their consequences. Finally, we place the practice of dialogue on science?related issues in relation to the wider political process and draw out implications for scientists in particular

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/13698230500187227

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,272

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On how the Dialogue between Religion and Science is possible.Marica Mircea Adrian - 2014 - Dialogo 1 (1):116-119.
Issues in Establishing Environmental Dialogue.Peter Mitias - 2004 - Dialogue and Universalism 14 (3/4):171-198.
Locating Scientific Citizenship: The Institutional Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement.Nick Pidgeon, Mavis Jones, Irene Lorenzoni & Karen Bickerstaff - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (4):474-500.
Śūnyatā and kokoro: Science–religion dialogue in the japanese context.Seung Chul Kim - 2015 - Zygon 50 (1):155-171.
Bioart as a Dialogue.Tetiana Gardashuk - 2017 - Dialogue and Universalism 27 (3):83-96.
On the Art of Intercultural Dialogue. Some Forms, Conditions and Structures.Ulrich Diehl - 2005 - In P. N. Von und zu Liechtenstein Ch M. Gueye (ed.), Peace and Intercultural Dialogue. Universitätsverlag Winter.
Dialogue and Persuasion.Paweł Pasieka & Michael Hamerski - 2010 - Dialogue and Universalism 20 (9-10):113-129.
Enhancing cross-disciplinary science through philosophical dialogue: Evidence of improved group metacognition for effective collaboration.Brian Robinson & Chad Gonnerman - 2020 - In Graham Hubbs, Michael O'Rourke & Steven Hecht Orzack (eds.), The Toolbox Dialogue Initiative: The Power of Cross-Disciplinary Practice. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press. pp. 127-141.
A priority paper for the societal and ethical aspects of synthetic biology.M. Schmidt, A. Ganguli-Mitra, H. Torgersen, A. Kelle, Anna Https://Orcidorg Deplazes & N. Https://Orcidorg Biller-Andorno - 2009 - .

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
34 (#529,717)

6 months
12 (#449,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.V. Blok & P. Lemmens - 2015 - In Bert-Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swierstra & Jeroen van den Hoven (eds.), Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 19-35.
Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within.Carl Mitcham, Roop L. Mahajan & Erik Fisher - 2006 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 26 (6):485-496.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Limitations of public dialogue in science and the rise of new 'experts'.Bill Durodié - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (4):82-92.

Add more references