Zeitschrift Für Evangelische Ethik 52 (3):200-211 (2008)
Abstract |
The study investigates the »Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics« published by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress with a particular concern for the principle of respect for autonomy. The leading question is in which philosophical background autonomy is dealt with by Beauchamp/childress and by the enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant, while the more emipirical theoretical framework of Beauchamp/childress and the rationalistic framework of Kant are being analyzed. After having considered the foundation of autonomy both in Beauchamp/childress and Kant, the study turns to the relationship of autonomy and human dignity by exploring the implicit extension of autonomy, human dignity and being human, and asks which consequences have to be drawn from a theological point of view.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.14315/zee-2008-0306 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Autonomy and Responsibility — Philosophical Considerations on the Moral Relationship Between a Physician and a Patient.Brigitte Flickinger - 2018 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 7 (2):475-491.
Similar books and articles
Respect for Autonomy and Human Dignity in Codes of Conduct of Health Care Professionals (in Slovakia).Katarína Komenská - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):192-200.
Ein vier-Prinzipien-Ansatz für die Bioethik: Geschichte, Methode, Kritik und Übertragbarkeit auf andere Bereiche.Peter Schröder - 2007 - Zeitschrift Für Evangelische Ethik 51 (3):182-198.
Humanity as an Object of Respect: Immanuel Kant's Anthropological Approach and the Foundation for Morality.Sibylle Rolf - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (4):594-605.
Maternal-Fetal Conflict and "Principles of Biomedical Ethics", by Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress: Fostering a Relationship Between Flexibility and Stability. [REVIEW]Constance Karin Perry - 1993 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
What Really Separates Casuistry From Principlism in Biomedical Ethics.Paul Cudney - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (3):205-229.
Beyond Autonomy to the Person Coping With Illness.David C. Thomasma - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):12.
What is the Common Morality, Really?Benjamin Bautz - 2016 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (1):29-45.
Beauchamp Et Childress, 2008 Les Principes de l'Éthique Biomédicale. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. 39 Éd. Les Belles Lettres: Paris (2008). P. 644. Traduit de L'Américain. [REVIEW] Laredaction - 2008 - Médecine et Droit 2008 (89):59-59.
The Range of Autonomy: Informed Consent in Medicine.Alfred D. Beasley & Glenn C. Graber - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Reviewing Autonomy: Implications of the Neurosciences and the Free Will Debate for the Principle of Respect for the Patient's Autonomy.Sabine Müller & Henrik Walter - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):205.
Whose Life is It Anyway? A Study in Respect for Autonomy.M. Norden - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):179-183.
Menschenwürde und das Bedürfnis nach Respekt.Peter Baumann - 2003 - In Ralf Stoecker (ed.), Menschenwürde – Annäherungen an einen Begriff. öbv&hpt. pp. 19-34.
Not Just Autonomy--The Principles of American Biomedical Ethics.S. Holm - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):332-338.
Autonomy and Negatively Informed Consent.Ulrik Kihlbom - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):146-9.
The Problem of 'Thick in Status, Thin in Content' in Beauchamp and Childress' Principlism.Marvin J. H. Lee - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (9):525-528.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-01-11
Total views
18 ( #610,873 of 2,518,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,143 )
2017-01-11
Total views
18 ( #610,873 of 2,518,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,143 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads