Lame Science? Blind Religion?

Zygon 54 (2):351-353 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In Consecrating Science, Lisa Sideris argues that an anthropocentric and science‐based cosmology encourages human arrogance and diminishes a sense of wonder in human experience immersed in the natural world, as found in diverse cultural and religious traditions. I agree with her that science elevated to a commanding worldview, scientism, is a common and contemporary mistake, to be deplored, a lame science. But I further argue that science has introduced us to the marvels of deep nature and vastly increased our human appreciation of nature as a wonderland at levels great and small. Sideris is right to fear consecrating science. She—and the humanists, sages, and saviors—need also to fear blindness to what science has to teach us about cosmogenesis and wonderland Earth.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science and Religion: A Critical Survey.Holmes Rolston - 1989 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 26 (3):185-185.
Science & religion: a critical survey.Holmes Rolston - 1987 - Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
Environmental Ethics and Religion/Science.Holmes Rolston Iii - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 908--928.
Is the blind spot blind?C. R. Garvey - 1933 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (1):83.


Added to PP

21 (#740,083)

6 months
4 (#796,002)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Out of My Later Years.Albert Einstein - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (9):92-93.

Add more references