Crazy Like a Fox: Validity and Ethics of Animal Models of Human Psychiatric Disease

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (2):140-151 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animal models of human disease play a central role in modern biomedical science. Developing animal models for human mental illness presents unique practical and philosophical challenges. In this article we argue that existing animal models of psychiatric disease are not valid, attempts to model syndromes are undermined by current nosology, models of symptoms are rife with circular logic and anthropomorphism, any model must make unjustified assumptions about subjective experience, and any model deemed valid would be inherently unethical, for if an animal adequately models human subjective experience, then there is no morally relevant difference between that animal and a human

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evaluating Animal Models: Some Taxonomic Worries.C. Degeling & J. Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (2):91-106.
Are animal models predictive for humans?Niall Shanks, Ray Greek & Jean Greek - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:2.
Michael Polanyi and Human Identity.David Kettle - 1994 - Tradition and Discovery 21 (3):5-18.
Not a Not-Animal: The Vocation to be a Human Animal Creature.David Clough - 2013 - Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (1):4-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
34 (#456,993)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernard Rollin
Last affiliation: Colorado State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references