God the Object, Sign, and Interpretant

Philosophy and Theology 31 (1):97-119 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central thesis of this essay is that the relation imagined to hold between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit corresponds quite closely with the triadic relationship that holds between object, sign, and interpretant, respectively, within C. S. Peirce’s conception of semiosis. Section 1 introduces Peirce’s conception of semiosis. Section 2 supports the main thesis through examination of descriptions of the Trinitarian relations in two classic Christian texts: The New Testament and The Catechism of the Catholic Church. Section 3 reviews two alternative explanations of this surprising correlation: Andrew Robinson’s vestigia Trinitatis explanation and a naturalistic alternative.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The semiotic stance.Paul Kockelman - 2005 - Semiotica 2005 (157):233-304.
Translation as semiotic mediation.Winfried Nöth - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (3/4):279-298.
The Semiotics of Learning New Words.Winfried Nöth - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (3):446-456.
Peirce’s Concept of Sign. [REVIEW]B. O. G. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (4):753-754.
Goethe’s glosses to translation.Dinda Gorlée - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (3-4):340-367.
Goethe’s glosses to translation.Dinda Gorlée - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (3/4):340-367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-23

Downloads
37 (#420,900)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Rohr
Boston University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references