Cognitive emergence

Philosophy of Science Supplement 64 (4):346-58 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Examination of attempts at theory reduction (S to T) shows that a process of cognitive emergence is involved in which concepts of S, Cs, emerge from T. This permits the 'bridge laws' to be stated. These are not in conflict with incommensurability of the Cs with the CT. Cognitive emergence may occur asymptotically or because of similarities of mathematical expressions; it is not necessarily holistic. Mereologically and nonmereologically related theory pairs are considered. Examples are chosen from physics. An important distinction is made between 'theory reduction' and 'reductive explanation'



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strong and weak emergence.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In Philip Clayton & Paul Davies (eds.), The re-emergence of emergence: the emergentist hypothesis from science to religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Emergence in physics.Andreas Hüttemann & Orestis Terzidis - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):267-281.
Asymptotics, reduction and emergence.C. A. Hooker - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (3):435-479.


Added to PP

124 (#142,568)

6 months
17 (#141,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Emergence, Not Supervenience.Paul Humphreys - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (S4):S337-S345.
Diachronic Emergence as Transubstantiation.Peter Wyss - 2023 - Philosophia 51 (3):1745-1762.
Cognitive scientific realism.Fritz Rohrlich - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (2):185-202.
Recent Work in the History and Philosophy of Chemistry.Jeffry L. Ramsey - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (4):409-427.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references