Noûs 48 (4):699-717 (2014)

Authors
Guy Rohrbaugh
Auburn University
Abstract
In some quarters, it is held that Anscombe proved that a zygote is not a human being on the basis of an argument involving the possibility of identical twins, but there is surprisingly little agreement on what her argument is supposed to be. I criticize several extant interpretations, both as interpretations of Anscombe and as self-standing arguments, and offer a different understanding of her conclusion on which the non-specificity of creation processes and their goals is at issue.
Keywords Anscombe  Twin  Zygote  Human Being  Creation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/nous.12034
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1689 - London, England: Oxford University Press.
Material Beings.Peter van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Papers on Time and Tense.Arthur Norman Prior - 1968 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fission theories of Original Guilt.Nikk Effingham - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-16.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anscombe's 'Teachers'.Jeremy Wanderer - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (2):204-221.
Interpreting Anscombe’s Intention §32FF.Anne Newstead - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:157-176.
Anscombe on Bodily Self-Knowledge.John McDowell - 2011 - In Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby & Frederick Stoutland (eds.), Essays on Anscombe's Intention. Harvard University Press.
Anscombe on Justifying Claims to Know One's Bodily Position.Tommy L. Lott - 1989 - Philosophical Investigations 12 (October):293-307.
‘By’: A Refutation of the Anscombe Thesis.Benjamin Schnieder - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (6):649 - 669.
Anscombe on Expression of Intention : An Exegesis.Richard Moran & Martin J. Stone - 2011 - In Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby & Frederick Stoutland (eds.), Essays on Anscombe's Intention. Harvard University Press.
Making True.Elizabeth Anscombe - 2000 - In Roger Teichmann (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-9.
Modern Moral Philosophy.Anthony O'Hear (ed.) - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-07-03

Total views
68 ( #166,801 of 2,497,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #171,501 of 2,497,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes