Environmental Values 27 (2):137-158 (2018)

Authors
Yasha Rohwer
University of Missouri, Columbia
Abstract
In this article I argue that humans have a pro tanto duty to cognitively enhance some animals threatened with extinction. I will use as a case study a particular set of animals: smaller Australian marsupials. Many of these animals are on the brink of extinction thanks to the introduction of the fox and the domestic cat to the continent of Australia. Ecologists conjecture that these marsupials do not have the behavioural flexibility to cope with these introduced predators. By introducing predators, humans performed a wrong action because it led to the extinction of species and continues to threaten many marsupials species such as woylies, Gilbert's potoroos, numbats and mountain pygmy possums. This wrong action gives rise to an obligation to intervene to prevent further species loss. Traditional means of conservation do not seem sufficient to address this obligation; therefore, there is a duty to cognitively enhance these creatures as soon as the technology is sufficiently researched and safe.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3197/096327118x15162907484448
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Learning to Live With and Without Animals.Thomas Greaves & Norman Dandy - 2022 - Environmental Values 31 (2):125-130.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Undermining Indirect Duty Theories.Robert Bass - 2006 - Between the Species (6):1.
Animals in the Kingdom of Ends.Heather M. Kendrick - 2010 - Between the Species 13 (10):2.
The Duty to Aid Nonhuman Animals in Dire Need.John Hadley - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4):445-451.
The Duty to Aid Nonhuman Animals in Dire Need.John Hadley - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4):445–451.
An Obligation to Enhance?Anton Vedder - 2019 - Topoi 38 (1):49-52.
A Direct Kantian Duty to Animals.Michael Cholbi - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):338-358.
Animals, Predators, the Right to Life, and the Duty to Save Lives.Aaron Simmons - 2009 - Ethics and the Environment 14 (1):pp. 15-27.
Can I Have a Duty to Believe in God?Jonathan Harrison - 1957 - Philosophy 32 (122):241 - 252.
Persons or Property – Freedom and the Legal Status of Animals.Andreas T. Schmidt - forthcoming - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-02

Total views
31 ( #368,176 of 2,504,815 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,815 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes