Mind 84 (April):210-224 (1975)
Abstract |
Causal accounts of perception are often believed to lead inevitably to the conclusion that we only indirectly perceive things. The paper argues that there are no incompatibilities between accepting causal accounts of perception (e.G., Many scientific explanations of perception) and holding that we directly perceive physical objects, Without the mediation of sense data. Further, There are strong analogical arguments which support the view that talk of causal accounts of perception is consistent with the philosophical position of direct realism
|
Keywords | Belief Epistemology Idea Object Perception |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/mind/LXXXIV.1.210 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Best With What We Have: A Threefold Metaphysics of Perception.Andrea Bucci - 2018 - Brainfactor:1-11.
Similar books and articles
The Veil of Perception and Contextual Relativism.Dimitris Platchias - 2004 - Sorites 15 (December):76-86.
An Examination of D M Armstrong's Theory of Perception.John O. Nelson - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (2):154-160.
The Mystery of Direct Perceptual Justification.Peter Markie - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (3):347-373.
Self-Awareness and Mental Perception.Hisayasu Kobayashi - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):233-245.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
80 ( #145,121 of 2,508,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,711 of 2,508,119 )
2009-01-28
Total views
80 ( #145,121 of 2,508,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,711 of 2,508,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads