The necessity of the present and Anselm's eternalist response to the problem of theological fatalism
Religious Studies 43 (1):25-47 (2007)
AbstractIt is often argued that the eternalist solution to the freedom/foreknowledge dilemma fails. If God's knowledge of your choices is eternally fixed, your choices are necessary and cannot be free. Anselm of Canterbury proposes an eternalist view which entails that all of time is equally real and truly present to God. God's knowledge of your choices entails only a ‘consequent’ necessity which does not conflict with libertarian freedom. I argue this by showing that if consequent necessity does conflict with libertarian freedom then God's knowledge in the present would conflict with the freedom of a present choice. Absurd. (Published Online January 15 2007).
Similar books and articles
God is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann.Katherin A. Rogers - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Fatalism: Logical and Theological.Alicia Finch & Ted A. Warfield - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):233-238.
Timeless Troubles: The Challenge of Prophecy to the Eternity Solution to the Foreknowledge/Freedom Dilemma.John J. Fitzgerald - 2008 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:203-215.
A Problem for Hasker: Freedom with Respect to the Present, Hard Facts, and Theological Incompatibilism.Michael Rota - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
Anselm and His Islamic Contempories on Divine Necessity and Eternity.Katherin Rogers - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):373-393.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Eternity Solution to the Problem of Human Freedom and Divine Foreknowledge.Michael Rota - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):165 - 186.
In Defense of the Timeless Solution to the Problem of Human Free Will and Divine Foreknowledge.Ciro De Florio & Aldo Frigerio - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (1):5-28.
Future Freedom and the Fixity of Truth: Closing the Road to Limited Foreknowledge Open Theism. [REVIEW]Benjamin H. Arbour - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):189-207.
References found in this work
No references found.