Utilitas 22 (2):198-221 (2010)

Authors
Jason Rogers
University of Rochester
Abstract
In this paper, I develop, motivate and offer a qualified defense of a version of satisficing consequentialism (SC). I develop the view primarily in light of objections to other versions of SC recently posed by Ben Bradley. I motivate the view by showing that it (1) accommodates the intuitions apparently supporting those objections, (2) is supported by certain ‘common sense’ moral intuitions about specific cases, and (3) captures the central ideas expressed by satisficing consequentialists in the recent literature. Finally, I offer a qualified defense of the view that consists in showing that it meets Bradley’s criteria for being a version of satisficing consequentialism that is ‘worth considering’. Specifically, it is a version of SC that solves certain problems for maximizing consequentialism and yet does not permit the gratuitous prevention of goodness.
Keywords satisficing  consequentialism  maximizing  Bradley  gratuitous prevention of goodness  ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820810000099
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Against Satisficing Consequentialism.Ben Bradley - 2006 - Utilitas 18 (2):97-108.
Consequences of Consequentialism.David Sosa - 1993 - Mind 102 (405):101-122.
Two Kinds of Satisficing.Thomas Hurka - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 59 (1):107 - 111.
How Satisficers Get Away with Murder.Tim Mulgan - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (1):41 – 46.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Willpower Satisficing.Richard Yetter Chappell - 2019 - Noûs 53 (2):251-265.
Satisficing and Motivated Submaximization (in the Philosophy of Religion).Chris Tucker - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (1):127-143.
Accommodating Options.Seth Lazar - 2019 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (1):233-255.
How to Think About Satisficing.Chris Tucker - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (6):1365-1384.
Deontic Pluralism and the Right Amount of Good.Richard Y. Chappell - 2020 - In Douglas W. Portmore (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Consequentialism. Oxford University Press. pp. 498-512.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-01-04

Total views
229 ( #45,555 of 2,462,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,664 of 2,462,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes