Chandler D. Rogers
Boston College
On ground shared by environmental hermeneutics, critical social theory, and environmentally minded feminism, this article attempts to conciliate between the nearly antithetical ethical viewpoints of environmental philosophers David Abram and Steven Vogel. It will demonstrate first that Abram’s linguistic arguments for extending ethical considerability to nonhuman nature succumb to two of Vogel’s debilitating critiques, which it labels the social constructivist critique and the discourse ethics critique, and secondly that Abram fails to guard against the problem of human-human oppression. The article also points out, on the other hand, that while Vogel evades the problem of human-human oppression, his view fails to protect against the problem of dangerous anthropocentrism. Operating within the boundaries that Vogel establishes, it will seek to avoid the pitfalls of Abram’s view, to address the underlying ideology that leads to both types of oppression, and to eliminate the problem of dangerous anthropocentrism. To do so it draws upon the arguments of Trish Glazebrook, contending that Abram’s appeals to the “speech” of nature can be more effectively conceptualized as erotic appeals, and that engaging in this call-and-response eros promotes the development of virtues that undermine our current ideology and extend to both the human and the nonhuman.
Keywords Environmental Ethics  Discourse Ethics  Social Constructivism  Critical Social Theory  Ecophenomenology  Ecofeminism  Environmental Hermeneutics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Environmental Philosophy After the End of Nature.Steven Vogel - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (1):23-39.
Environmental Ethics.Clare Palmer, Katie McShane & Ron Sandler - 2014 - Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39:419-442.
Ecological Feminism as Environmental Ethics.Christine June Cuomo - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
How is Environmental Ethics Possible?Wang Xinyan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:155-167.
Desiring Nature, Queering Ethics.Catriona Sandilands - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (2):169-188.
Discourse Ethics and Nature.Angelika Krebs - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (3):269-279.
New Nature Narratives. Landscape Hermeneutics and Environmental Ethics.M. Drenthen - 2013 - In Forrest Clingerman, Martin Drenthen, Brian Treanor & David Utsler (eds.), Interpreting Nature. The Emerging Field of Environmental Hermeneutics. Fordham University Press. pp. 225-241.
Critical Environmental Hermeneutics.John van Buren - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (3):259-275.
Nature, Continental Philosophy, and Environmental Ethics.Alison Stone - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (3):285-294.


Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #191,375 of 2,499,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #67,534 of 2,499,425 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes