Condition B effects in two simple steps

Natural Language Semantics 18 (2):115-140 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is concerned with constraints on the interpretation of pronominal anaphora, in particular Condition B effects. It aims to contribute to a particular approach, initiated by Reinhart (Anaphora and semantic interpretation, 1983) and further developed elsewhere. It proposes a modification of Reinhart’s Interface Rule, and argues that the resulting theory compares favorably with others, while being compatible with independently motivated general hypotheses about the interaction between different interpretive mechanisms

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unmatched chains and the representation of plural pronouns.Mark C. Baker - 1992 - Natural Language Semantics 1 (1):33-73.
Quantification, Pronouns, and VP Anaphora.Barbara Partee & Emmon Bach - 1984 - In Partee Barbara & Bach Emmon (eds.), Truth, Interpretation and Information,. Foris Publications. pp. 99-130.
A squib on anaphora and coindexing.Reinhard Muskens - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):85-89.
Pronouns.Daniel Büring - 2011 - In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 971-996.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
88 (#202,930)

6 months
7 (#588,320)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Floris Roelofsen
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations