War, Responsibility, and Law Enforcement

In War and Self Defense. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter argues that military action against an aggressive state may be justified as a form of law enforcement rather than self-defence. The establishment of something like a minimal universal state is needed for such a justification to be effective. It is also argued that the justification of any form of military action requires a moral explanation of why the soldiers against whom one fights are appropriate objects of violence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,105

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When May Soldiers Participate in War?Uwe Steinhoff - 2016 - International Theory 8 (2):262-296.
Blair on Rodin: Rejoinder.Per Albert Ilsaas - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (4):313-316.
Defending the common life: National-defence after Rodin.Deane-Peter Baker - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (3):259–275.
International Law.David Rodin - 2002 - In War and Self Defense. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
War and Self Defense.David Rodin - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Conclusion: Morality and Realism.David Rodin - 2002 - In War and Self Defense. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
7 (#1,672,492)

6 months
7 (#647,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Rodin
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Provocateurs.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):597-622.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references