Searle's correspondence theory of truth and the slingshot

Philosophical Quarterly 48 (193):513-522 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/1467-9213.00119

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What is a correspondence theory of truth?D. Patterson - 2003 - Synthese 137 (3):421 - 444.
How Wittgenstein Escapes the Slingshot.A. C. Genova - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:1-22.
The correspondence theory of truth.Frank Hofmann - manuscript
The slingshot argument and the correspondence theory of truth.James O. Young - 2002 - Acta Analytica 17 (2):121-132.
The Slingshot Argument, Gödel's Hesitation and Tarskian Semantics.Arhat Virdi - 2009 - Prolegomena 8 (1):233-241.
Don't forget about the correspondence theory of truth.Marian David - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.
Truthmaking and the Slingshot.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 1999 - In Uwe Meixner & Peter Simons (eds.), Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age: Papers of the 22nd International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#195,744)

6 months
18 (#134,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Hyper-Slingshot. Is Fact-Arithmetic Possible?Wojciech Krysztofiak - 2015 - Foundations of Science 20 (1):59-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Could There Be Conjunctive Universals?Alex Oliver - 1992 - Analysis 52 (2):88 - 97.
The Slingshot Argument.Stephen Read - 1993 - Logique Et Analyse 36:195-218.
Theories of Truth.P. Horwich - 1994 - Dartmouth.

Add more references