Does the Use of Social Media Tools in Classrooms Increase Student Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility?
Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020)
AbstractThere is an increasing demand for ethical and Corporate Social Responsibility practices by companies. This competence has to be introduced in students’ training in business degree programs, and a check must then be done to determine if the students have come to appreciate the importance of CSR commitments. Using the framework of Stakeholders Theory, this work aims to examine students’ perceptions of ethical and CSR practices and commitment to different stakeholders, as well as the factors that lead students to act in a socially responsible way. Furthermore, we hope to identify how the perception of CSR can be improved when Web 2.0 and social media tools that have proven effective in transmitting emotions and values are used in classrooms to teach these ideas. To this end, a survey was carried out in the year 2019 with 1,030 first-year students; it was administered at the beginning of the semester and also at the end of the semester after the training activities had been carried out. The main finding of the research is that students start with the belief that ethics and CSR are developed for reasons of image and legitimacy; however, after receiving training on these topics through tools that take into account emotions and values, they start to value the importance of the company as an agent of social change. The main practical and managerial implication is that methods based on Web 2.0 and social media tools are useful to teach ethics and CSR; the theoretical contribution is that students take into account the welfare of others. This finding contributes to Stakeholder Theory in a higher education context.
Similar books and articles
Personal characteristics in college students' evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility.Peter Arlow - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (1):63 - 69.
An examination of business students' perception of corporate social responsibilities before and after bankruptcies.Rafik Z. Elias - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (3):267-281.
Corporate social responsibility perception in business students as future managers: a multifactorial analysis.María del Mar Alonso-Almeida, Fernando Casani Fernández de Navarrete & Jesus Rodriguez-Pomeda - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (1):1-17.
Social Media for Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy Creation and Communication in Poland.Justyna Szumniak-Samolej - 2019 - In Aneta Długopolska-Mikonowicz, Sylwia Przytuła & Christopher Stehr (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland: Strategies, Opportunities and Challenges. Springer Verlag. pp. 273-286.
Backlash Hits Business Ethics: Finding Effective Strategies for Communicating the Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility.Mary Lyn Stoll - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):17-24.
Values and Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions of Chinese University Students.Lei Wang & Heikki Juslin - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (1):57-82.
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of Perceptions of Practicing Accountants and Accounting Students.Nabil A. Ibrahim, John P. Angelidis & Donald P. Howard - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2-3):157-167.
The Relationship between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are there Differences Between Business Managers and Students?Nabil A. Ibrahim, Donald P. Howard & John P. Angelidis - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):165-174.
Developing Critical Thinking about the Role of Business as a Private Social Institution.Alain Lapointe & Corinne Gendron - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:307-312.
How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment.Duygu Turker - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):189-204.
Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time.Angela R. Bielefeldt & Nathan E. Canney - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1535-1551.
Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction.Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):159 - 172.
Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time.Nathan Canney & Angela Bielefeldt - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1535-1551.
New tools to Foster corporate socially responsible behavior.Antonio Tencati, Francesco Perrini & Stefano Pogutz - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):173-190.
Ethical competence expressed in students’ written texts.Annika Lilja - 2020 - HTS Theological Studies 76 (1).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between canadian business students and accounting professionals.Jeffrey R. Cohen, Laurie W. Pant & David J. Sharp - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (4):319 - 336.
Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business.Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (6):469 - 480.
Corporate Motives for Social Initiative: Legitimacy, Sustainability, or the Bottom Line? [REVIEW]Peggy Simcic Brønn & Deborah Vidaver-Cohen - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):91 - 109.
The Influence of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors on Social Entrepreneurship Start Up Intentions.Joyce Koe Hwee Nga & Gomathi Shamuganathan - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2):259-282.