Rancière’s Productive Contradictions

Symposium 15 (2):28-56 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the force and limitations of Jacques Rancière’s novel attempt to rethink the relationship between aesthetics and politics. In particular, it unravels the paradoxical threads of the fundamental contradiction between two of his steadfast claims: (1) art and politics are consubstantial, and (2) art and politics never truly merge. In taking Rancière to task on this point, the primary objective of this article is to work through the nuances of his project andforeground the problems inherent therein in order to break with the “talisman complex” and the “ontological illusion” of the politics of aesthetics in the name of a new understanding of the social politicity of artistic practices.

Similar books and articles

Jacques Rancière’s Lesson on the Lesson.Samuel A. Chambers - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (6):637-646.
Why Rancière now?Joseph J. Tanke - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (2):pp. 1-17.
Rancière and metaphysics.Jean-Luc Nancy - 2009 - In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press.
Jacques Rancière and the problem of pure politics.Samuel A. Chambers - 2011 - European Journal of Political Theory 10 (3):303-326.
Rancière in South Carolina.Todd May - 2009 - In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press.
Jacques Rancière: Literature and Equality.Todd May - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (1):83-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
1,669 (#5,707)

6 months
292 (#6,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gabriel Rockhill
Villanova University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references