On Foundationalism: A Strategy for Metaphysical Realism

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In ancient times, the main approaches to metaphysical realism were intuitive. In modern times, foundationalism has replaced intuition as the main strategy to make out metaphysical realist claims to know. In On Foundationalism, Rockmore argues that foundationalism fails in all its known variants

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Foundationalism. [REVIEW]George Allan - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (1):196-198.
The confusion over foundationalism.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1986 - Philosophia 16 (3-4):345-354.
Two concepts of the given in C. I. Lewis: Realism and foundationalism.Christopher W. Gowans - 1989 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (4):573-590.
Ex nihilo nihil fit? Medicine rests on solid foundations.Miles Little - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):467-470.
Rorty's critique of foundationalism.Timm Triplett - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 52 (1):115 - 129.
What’s Not Wrong with Foundationalism.Michael Bergmann - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):161–165.
The Problem of Intuition.Steven D. Hales - 2000 - American Philosophical Quarterly 37 (2):135-147.
An argument against foundationalism.John Kekes - 1983 - Philosophia 12 (3-4):273-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-06

Downloads
25 (#542,984)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Rockmore
Duquesne University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references