No Gaps, No God?

Philosophy and Theology 21 (1-2):129-153 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Darwinian atheists ridicule the “God of the Gaps” argument, claiming that it is theology and/or metaphysics masquerading as science.This is true as far as it goes, but Darwinian atheism relies on an argument which is equally metaphysical, which I call the “No Gaps,No God” argument. This atheist argument is metaphysical because it relies on a kind of conceptual necessity, rather than scientificobservations or experiments. “No Gaps No God” is a much better metaphysical argument than “God of the Gaps,” because the latteris based on a clearly false conditional inference. However, there are also good, but not decisive, arguments against the “No Gaps NoGod” argument. Because metaphysical arguments never resolve as decisively as scientific research questions, there will probablyalways be a legitimate controversy at the metaphysical level on this topic, even though there is no serious controversy about Darwinianscience itself. If this fact were more widely acknowledged, it could help to defuse the controversy over teaching Darwin in the public schools.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

No Gaps, No God?Teed Rockwell - 2009 - Philosophy and Theology 21 (1-2):129-153.
The extent of metaphysical necessity.Daniel Nolan - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):313-339.
Freedom and miracles.John Martin Fischer - 1988 - Noûs 22 (2):235-252.
Explanation in Metaphysics?Johannes Persson - 2011 - Metaphysica 12 (2):165-181.
What is a truth-value gap?James R. Shaw - 2014 - Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (6):503-534.
On Some Presumed Gaps in Kant's Refutation of Idealism.Jacqueline Marina - 2004 - In Udo Rameil (ed.), Metaphysik und Kritik. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 153-166.
Taking a Step Back from the Gap.Robert Van Gulick - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2:123-133.
Moving Intersticial Gaps.James H. Schmerl - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (2):283-296.
El silencio del derecho.Eugenio Bulygin - 2002 - Análisis Filosófico 22 (2):103-114.


Added to PP

14 (#940,384)

6 months
2 (#1,182,310)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Teed Rockwell
Sonoma State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references