What Do I See When I See This Lion?

Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 76 (2):335-364 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When William of Ockham’s use of the term ‘concept’ is examined, it becomes clear that intuitive cognitions, in and of themselves, cannot function as concepts and thus cannot supposit , in mental propositions. This is because intuitive cognitions pertain only to the singulars in the world that cause them, whereas concepts are universals, natural signs that are, at least in principle, common to many. Since scientific knowledge is of the universal, the subject and predicate terms of mental propositions must be universal terms and thus, concepts. Nonetheless, intuitive cognitions provide the ground for scientific knowledge, as the basis for abstractive and mixed abstractive/intuitive concepts

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sovereignty.A. Lion - 1940 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40:135 - 176.
The Lion King.Jonathan Barfield - 2013 - Philosophy Now 94:46-47.
If A Lion Could Talk….John Churchill - 1989 - Philosophical Investigations 12 (4):308-324.
Lion Talk.C. Grant Luckhardt - 1995 - Philosophical Investigations 18 (1):1-12.
Reconciling Lion and Lamb?John Dupré - 2003 - Metascience 12 (2):223-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references