The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project – a feasibility study of large‐scale clinical service peer review

, , , &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):927-932 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01224.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A randomized trial of peer review: the UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project: three‐year evaluation.Christopher M. Roberts, Robert A. Stone, Rhona J. Buckingham, Nancy A. Pursey, Derek Lowe & Jonathan M. Potter - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):599-605.
A prospective study of the practical issues of local involvement in national audit of COPD.C. M. Roberts, D. Lowe, S. Barnes & M. G. Pearson - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (2):281-290.
A community model of group therapy for the older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pilot study.Jean Woo, Wayne Chan, Fai Yeung, Wai M. Chan, Elsie Hui, Christopher M. Lum, Kevin H. Or, David S. C. Hui & Diana T. F. Lee - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (5):523-531.
Evaluation of changes in guidelines for medication management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Fang‐Ju Lin, Todd A. Lee, Pei Shieen Wong & A. Simon Pickard - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):953-960.
The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review – when is an audit not an audit?Paul Bowie, Sarah Cooke, Penny Lo, John McKay & Murray Lough - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3):352-357.
Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: a five‐year study of assessment by peer review.John McKay, Paul Bowie & Murray Lough - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):622-629.
Chronic care management for patients with COPD: a critical review of available evidence.Karin M. M. Lemmens, Lidwien C. Lemmens, José H. C. Boom, Hanneke W. Drewes, Jolanda A. C. Meeuwissen, Lotte M. G. Steuten, Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef & Caroline A. Baan - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):734-752.
What We Owe the Author: rethinking editorial peer review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-457.
Insufficient evidence of benefit: a systematic review of home telemonitoring for COPD.Charlotte E. Bolton, Cerith S. Waters, Susan Peirce & Glyn Elwyn - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6):1216-1222.
Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction?A. Miles, P. Bentley, A. Polychronis, N. Price & J. Grey - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (1):29-35.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Adherence to treatment guidelines and long‐term survival in hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Irena Sarc, Tina Jeric, Kristina Ziherl, Stanislav Suskovic, Mitja Kosnik, Stefan D. Anker & Mitja Lainscak - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (4):737-743.
The comparison of different dyspnoea scales in patients with COPD.Sevgi Ozalevli & Eyup S. Ucan - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (5):532-538.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
25 (#614,662)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The evolution of clinical audit as a tool for quality improvement.Berk Michael, Callaly Thomas & Hyland Mary - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):251-257.

Add more references