European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):155-171 (2012)

Abstract
Both Rawls and Walzer argue for a supreme emergency exemption and are commonly thought to do so for the same reasons. However, far from ‘aping’ Walzer, Rawls engages in a reconstruction of the exemption that changes its focus altogether, making clear its dependence on an account of universal human rights and the idea of a well-ordered society. This paper is therefore, in the first instance, textual, demonstrating that Rawls has been misinterpreted in the case of supreme emergency. In the second instance the approach is reconstructive, providing a reinterpretation of Rawls that fits his treatment of supreme emergency with his broader commitments in just war and international relations. This reinterpretation enables us to draw out a pattern of argument that Rawls appears to share with a much more strident liberal cosmopolitanism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1474885111425120
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

‘Supreme Emergencies’, Ontological Holism, and Rights to Communal Membership.J. Toby Reiner - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-21.
‘Supreme Emergencies’, Ontological Holism, and Rights to Communal Membership.J. Toby Reiner - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (4):425-445.
Rawls on International Economic Justice in The Law of Peoples.Rex Martin - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 127 (4):743-759.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Terrorism, Supreme Emergency and Killing the Innocent.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2009 - Perspectives - The Review of International Affairs 17 (1):105-126.
Rawls and War.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (2):185-200.
Just War and the Supreme Emergency Exemption. ByChristopherToner - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):545–561.
Just War and Graduated Discrimination.Christopher H. Toner - 2004 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):649-665.
Unraveling Emergency Justifications and Excuses for Terrorism.Shawn Kaplan - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (2):219-238.
Supreme Emergencies and the Continuum Problem.Daniel Statman - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):287-298.
The Incoherence of Walzer’s Just War Theory.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
Michael Walzer's Concept of 'Supreme Emergency'.Martin L. Cook - 2007 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (2):138-151.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-20

Total views
61 ( #188,928 of 2,518,734 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,867 of 2,518,734 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes