Taking Development Seriously: Toward a Genuinely Synthetic Biology

Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada) (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Human Genome Project is nearing completion, and shortly we will have access to the complete genetic sequence of an average human being. Hopes are high that the sequence will contribute profoundly to medicine in particular, but also to our understanding of our evolutionary past. Of course, detractors have long insisted that because the HGP represents a victory for formalism in biology, determining the function of DNA sequences will remain an outstanding problem for at least the next several decades. Moreover, it is not clear that having the complete sequence will be significantly useful to biologists seeking to understand gene function in the first place. What can we expect in the postgenomic era? ;I reject the very idea that a complete, encapsulated sequence of a human genome is foundational to biological understanding. I set my investigation within the framework of the ancient debate between preformationists and epigenecists. I survey and conceptually analyze arguments on both sides, especially as they relate to the separation of genetics and embryology in the early part of the twentieth century. I identify modern variants of both preformationism and epigenesis, and note their reconciliation in the form of a Modern Consensus on development established after the neo-Darwinian Synthesis in biology in the 1940s. ;Drawing on recent work in molecular and developmental biology, I challenge the seeming intuitiveness of the Modern Consensus and its subsumption of developmental concerns under the aegis of molecular genetics. I then propose and defend an alternative synthesis of preformationism and epigenesis, and of genetics and developmental biology, according to which development does not reduce to mere gene activation. I underscore the practical benefit of my perspective through a lengthy discussion of the psychiatric genetics approach to schizophrenia

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Molecular and Developmental Biology.Paul Griffiths - 2002 - In Peter Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. pp. 252-271.
Mapping Development or How Molecular is Molecular Biology?Soraya de Chadarevian - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (3):381 - 396.
Embryology and Evolution 1920-1960: Worlds Apart?Ron Amundson - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (3):335 - 352.
Genetics and philosophy : an introduction.Paul Griffiths & Karola Stotz - 2013 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reductionism redux: Computing the embryo. [REVIEW]Alex Rosenberg - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):445-470.
The concept of information in biology.John Maynard Smith - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):177-194.
Understanding Contemporary Genomics.John Dupré - 2004 - Perspectives on Science 12 (3):320-338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Robert
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

Developmental systems and animal behaviour.Jason Scott Robert - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (3):477-489.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references