Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (3):369-385 (2012)

Dan Robins
University of Hong Kong
The Later Moists grounded our linguistic abilities in our ability to distinguish between kinds on the basis of manifest similarities and differences among things. Proper names, however, require a different treatment. According to the Moists, when we use a proper name, we borrow a word for one kind of thing and use it to refer to something else, as when we name dogs “crane.” This view probably responds in part to arguments that the possibility of using any word to refer to any thing threatens the stability of language. Proper names may borrow from terms with existing uses, but arguably they do not thereby undermine those uses
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6253.2012.01728.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Realism and Conventionalism in Later Mohist Semantics.Daniel Stephens - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (4):521-542.
Semantics Without Truth in Later Mohist Philosophy of Language.Frank Saunders - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):215-229.
Realism About Kinds in Later Mohism.Chris Fraser - 2021 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 20 (1):93-114.
Concepts of Philosophy.Raji C. Steineck (ed.) - 2018 - Boston; Leiden: Brill.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Moists and the Gentlemen of the World.Dan Robins - 2008 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (3):385-402.
Names as Tokens and Names as Tools.M. W. Pelczar - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):133 - 155.
A Scene with Cranes: Engagement and Truth in Religion.Gareth Moore - 1994 - Philosophical Investigations 17 (1):1-13.
Description-Names.Eros Corazza - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):313-325.
Ethical Analysis of an Ancient Debate: Moists Versus Confucians.Christian Jochim - 1980 - Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (1):135 - 147.
The Semantics of Fictional Names.Fred Adams, Gary Fuller & Robert Stecker - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):128–148.
The Neuropsychology of Proper Names.Carlo Semenza - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):347-369.
On the Linguistic Complexity of Proper Names.Ora Matushansky - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):573-627.
Proper Names and Persons: Peirce's Semiotic Consideration of Proper Names.Eric Thomas Weber - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 346-362.
Causality, Referring, and Proper Names.David S. Schwarz - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (2):225 - 233.
Proper Names and Their Fictional Uses.Heidi Tiedke - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):707 - 726.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #271,799 of 2,518,486 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,486 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes