Is Iris Murdoch a Closet Existentialist? Some Trouble with Vision, Choice and Exegesis

European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):475-494 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Richard Moran argues that Iris Murdoch is an Existentialist who pretends not to be. His support for this view will be shown to depend on his attempt to assimilate Iris Murdoch's discussion of moral ‘vision’ in the parable of the Mother in Law to Sartre's thought on ‘choice’ and ‘orientation’. Discussing both Moran's Murdoch exegesis and Sartre's Being and Nothingness, I develop the Sartrean view to which Moran hopes to assimilate Murdoch, before pointing out how Moran's assimilation fails. Murdoch's thought that when M is just and loving she sees D ‘as she really is’ cannot be accommodated on Sartre's picture. I develop this point of disagreement between Murdoch and Sartre, and argue that Murdoch has not as Moran claims made a misattribution to Sartre of an unsituated will, but has instead offered a penetrating critique of the central theme of Sartre's epistemology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 80,022

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-24

Downloads
165 (#84,415)

6 months
2 (#319,119)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Being and nothingness.Jean-Paul Sartre - 1956 - Avenel, N.J.: Random House.
Metaphysics as a guide to morals.Iris Murdoch - 1993 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Allen Lane, Penguin Press.
Sartre, romantic rationalist.Iris Murdoch - 1961 - London: Chatto & Windus.
The Moral Interpretation of Religion.Peter Byrne - 1998 - Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Jean-Paul Sartre: basic writings.Jean-Paul Sartre (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Routledge.

View all 6 references / Add more references