Hillel and Confucius: The prescriptive formulation of the golden rule in the Jewish and Chinese Confucian ethical traditions

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 3 (1):29-41 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, the Golden Rule, a central ethical value to both Judaism and Confucianism, is evaluated in its prescriptive and proscriptive sentential formulations. Contrary to the positively worded, prescriptive formulation – “Love others as oneself” – the prohibitive formulation, which forms the injunction, “Do not harm others, as one would not harm oneself,” is shown to be the more prevalent Judaic and Confucian presentation of the Golden Rule. After establishing this point, the remainder of the article is dedicated to an inquiry into why this preference between the two Golden-Rule-formulations occurs. In doing so, this article discovers four main benefits to the proscriptive formulations: I) harm-doing, as opposed to generalizable moral goodness, is easier for individuals to subjectively comprehend II) the prevention of harm-doing is the most fundamental ethical priority III) the proscriptive formulation preserves self-directed discovery of what is good, thus preserving moral autonomy IV) individuals are psychologically pre-disposed toward responding to prohibitions rather than counsels of goodness.

Similar books and articles

Confucius: the golden rule.Russell Freedman - 2002 - New York: Arthur A. Levine Books. Edited by Frédéric Clément.
The examined life: Chinese perspectives: essays on Chinese ethical traditions.Xinyan Jiang (ed.) - 2002 - Binghamton, N.Y.: Global Publications, Binghamton University.
The confucian golden rule: A negative formulation.Robert E. Allinson - 1985 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 12 (3):305-315.
Confucian ethics and japanese management practices.Marc J. Dollinger - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):575 - 584.
Mencius and early Chinese thought.Kwong-loi Shun - 1997 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Levels of Meaning in the Golden Rule.Jeffrey Wattles - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):106 - 129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
993 (#12,414)

6 months
114 (#28,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert E. Allinson
Soka University

References found in this work

A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.
The evolution of the confucian concept jên.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1955 - Philosophy East and West 4 (4):295-319.
The confucian golden rule: A negative formulation.Robert E. Allinson - 1985 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 12 (3):305-315.
The Golden Rule.Marcus G. Singer - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (146):293 - 314.

View all 12 references / Add more references