Guilt by dissociation: Why mindreading may not be prior to metacognition after all

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):159-160 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carruthers argues that there is no developmental or clinical evidence that metacognition is dissociable from mindreading, and hence there is no reason to think that metacognition is prior to mindreading. A closer look at the evidence, however, reveals that these conclusions are premature at best

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mindreading underlies metacognition.Peter Carruthers - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):164-182.
Metacognition, mindreading, and insight in schizophrenia.Ben Wiffen & Anthony David - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):161-162.
Social-affective origins of mindreading and metacognition.Philippe Rochat - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):160-161.
Mirroring, mindreading, and simulation.Alvin I. Goldman - 2009 - In Jaime A. Pineda (ed.), Mirror Neuron Systems: The Role of Mirroring Processes in Social Cognition. New York: Humana Press. pp. 311-330.
""Banishing" I" and" we" from accounts of metacognition.Peter Carruthers - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-24

Downloads
38 (#397,063)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Robbins
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ins and outs of introspection.Philip Robbins - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (6):617–630.

Add more references