Designing Methuselah: an ethical argument against germline genetic modification to prolong human longevity

Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (9):645-647 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetic modification and genetic determinism.David B. Resnik & Daniel B. Vorhaus - 2006 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 1:9.
Similarity Arguments in the Genetic Modification Debate.Andreas Christiansen - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2):239-255.
"Playing God" and germline intervention.Ted Peters - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):365-386.
Human germline editing: a historical perspective.Michel Morange - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (4):34.
Shaping individuality: Human inheritable germ line Gene modification.Maurizio Salvi - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):527-542.
A Humanist Analysis of Ethical Arguments Concerning Germline Genetic Engineering.Faith Louise Lagay - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston
"Challenged Forth by the Need for Paper": Ethical Aspects of Genetic Modification of Trees.Mary Richardson - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:269-274.
Human Gene therapy: Why draw a line?W. French Anderson - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):681-693.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
27 (#552,153)

6 months
4 (#657,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Genome Editing for Longer Lives: The Problem of Loneliness.C. S. Wareham - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2):309-314.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references