Count No One Happy: Eudaimonia and Positive Psychology

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):81-90 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some aspects of "second-generation" Positive Psychology are analyzed and their origins explored. In particular, Seligman's importation of the concept of eudaimonia from Aristotelian ethics is critiqued and found to be problematic. This conclusion is reached through an examination of the concept of eudaimonia as it was employed in ancient philosophy. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Eudaimonia.Valerie Tiberius & Michelle Mason - 2009 - In Shane J. Lopez (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1--351.
Happy-people-pills and Prosocial Behaviour.Mark Walker - 2007 - Philosophica 79 (1):93-11.
Euthanasia and Eudaimonia.David Shaw - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (9):530-533.
Conflicting Uses of 'Happiness' and the Human Condition.Stephen M. Fishman & Lucille McCarthy - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):509-515.
Pleasure.Leonard D. Katz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A critique of positive psychology—or 'the new science of happiness'.Alistair Miller - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):591-608.
Can virtue make us happy?: the art of living and morality.Otfried Hoffe - 2010 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press. Edited by Douglas R. McGaughey & Aaron Bunch.
Happiness.Theodore Benditt - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (1):1 - 20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
51 (#305,341)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Woolfolk
Rutgers University, New Brunswick

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references