Applying the revenge system to the criminal justice system and jury decision-making

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):34-35 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

McCullough et al. propose an evolved cognitive revenge system which imposes retaliatory costs on aggressors. They distinguish between this and other forms of punishment (e.g., those administered by judges) which are not underpinned by a specifically designed evolutionary mechanism. Here we outline mechanisms and circumstances through which the revenge system might nonetheless infiltrate decision-making within the criminal justice system

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intelligent Computer Evaluation of Offender’s Previous Record.Uri J. Schild & Ruth Kannai - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (3-4):373-405.
Affective antecedents of revenge.Kieran O'Connor & Gabrielle S. Adams - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):29-30.
Criminal Justice: An Introduction to Philosophies, Theories and Practice.Ian Marsh - 2004 - Routledge. Edited by John Cochrane & Gaynor Melville.
Symbolic closure through memory, reparation and revenge in post-conflict societies.Brandon Hamber - 1999 - Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-12

Downloads
31 (#486,401)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references