All or Nothing in Objective Judgment

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (4):377 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On one common reading, Kant's epistemology involves an "all-Or-Nothing" principle: the mind achieves either objective knowledge or nothing at all. But then we cannot account for dreams. L w beck maintains that the categories also function in non-Veridical contexts (including dreams), But do not serve to distinguish these from veridical contexts. I argue that the categories determine coherence both within and among different contexts of experience, And hence determine which are veridical

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Certainty is Not a Mansion.Elly Vintiadis - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:143-152.
The role of judgment and orientation in hermeneutics.Rudolf A. Makkreel - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (1-2):29-50.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Edited by Peter Galison.
The Disjunctive Theory of Perception.Matthew Soteriou - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 edition).
The limits of objective assessment of medical practice.Thomas S. Huddle - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):487-496.
Kant's Subjective Deduction.Nathan Bauer - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
24 (#603,118)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Kant's Empirical Realism.Paul Abela - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references