International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):57-68 (1999)
AbstractSo serious a matter is capital punishment that we must consider very carefully any claim regarding its justification. Brian Calvert has offered a new version of the “argument from arbitrariness,” according to which a retributivist cannot consistently hold that some, but not all, first-degree murderers may justifiably receive the death penalty, when it is conceived to be a unique form of punishment. At the heart of this argument is the line-drawing problem, and I am inclined to think that it is a genuine challenge for the retributivist. I respond on behalf of the retributivist by formulating a line-drawing method that relies on the distinction between clearly deserving and not clearly deserving and is justified by a version of the lex talionis modified with an epistemic constraint
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kant's Justification of the Death Penalty Reconsidered.Benjamin S. Yost - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):1-27.
Retributivist Arguments Against Capital Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):188–197.
Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished? Arguments for and Against the Centuries-Old Punishment.Adina Nicoleta Gavrilă - 2011 - Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):82-98.
Desert, Justice and Capital Punishment.Patrick Lenta & Douglas Farland - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):273-290.
Death as Punishment: An Analysis of Eight Arguments Against Capital Punishment.Dawinder S. Sidhu - manuscript
Retribution, Arbitrariness and the Death Penalty.Brian Calvert - 1992 - Journal of Social Philosophy 23 (3):140-165.
Considering Capital Punishment as a Human Interaction.Christopher Bennett - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):367-382.
The Absence of Cruelty is Not the Presence of Humanness: Physicians and the Death Penalty in the United States.Joel B. Zivot - 2012 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 7:13-.
Afterword: Proportionality and the Difference Death Makes.William A. Edmundson - 2002 - Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):40-43.
Aggravated Murder and Capital Punishment.Tom Sorell - 1993 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):201-213.
The Ethics of Capital Punishment: A Philosophical Investigation of Evil and its Consequences.Matthew H. Kramer - 2011 - Oxford University Press.