Note on Culex—Lines 24–41

&
The Classical Review 28 (04):119-122 (1914)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0009840x00007174

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Metrical Peculiarity of the Culex.W. Warde Fowler - 1919 - The Classical Review 33 (5-6):95-97.
Culex 'Culex': Sources and their Bearing on the Problem of Authorship. By D. L. Drew. Pp. v + 107. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1925. [REVIEW]J. W. Mackail - 1926 - The Classical Review 40 (06):206-207.
A Note on Two Realist Lines of Argument.Crispin Wright - 1993 - In ¸ Itewright:Rmt. pp. 262--76.
Note on Tacitus Agricola, 33. 2.W. Warde Fowler - 1904 - The Classical Review 18 (01):43-44.
Note on the Country Festival in Tibullus II. i.W. Warde Fowler - 1908 - The Classical Review 22 (02):36-40.
Culex 275.O. Skutsch - 1954 - The Classical Review 4 (02):99-.
Remarks on the Culex.A. E. Housman - 1902 - The Classical Review 16 (07):339-346.
Gallus and The Culex.Duncan F. Kennedy - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (02):371-.
The Authorship of the Culex.S. Elizabeth Jackson - 1911 - Classical Quarterly 5 (03):163-.
Culex 272–6.A. Hudson-Williams - 1953 - The Classical Review 3 (02):80-82.
Culex 275.A. Hudson-Williams - 1955 - The Classical Review 5 (01):20-.
The Corsini MS. of the Culex.Robinson Ellis - 1892 - The Classical Review 6 (05):203-205.
A Theory of the Culex.Robinson Ellis - 1896 - The Classical Review 10 (04):177-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-06

Downloads
22 (#666,248)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references