Transgressions Are Equal, and Right Actions Are Equal: some Philosophical Reflections on Paradox III in Cicero’s Paradoxa Stoicorum

Philosophia 45 (1):317-334 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Paradoxa Stoicorum, the Roman philosopher Cicero defends six important Stoic theses. Since these theses seem counterintuitive, and it is not likely that the average person would agree with them, they were generally called "paradoxes". According to the third paradox, (P3), (all) transgressions (wrong actions) are equal and (all) right actions are equal. According to one interpretation of this principle, which I will call (P3′), it means that if it is forbidden that A and it is forbidden that B, then not-A is as good as not-B; and if it is permitted that A and it is permitted that B, then A is as good as B. In this paper, I show how it is possible to prove this thesis in dyadic deontic logic. I also try to defend (P3′) against some philosophical counterarguments. Furthermore, I address the claim that (P3′) is not a correct interpretation of Cicero’s third paradox and the assertion that it does not matter whether (P3′) is true or not. I argue that it does matter whether (P3′) is true or not, but acknowledge that (P3′) is perhaps a slightly different principle than Cicero’s thesis. The upshot is that (P3′) seems to be a plausible principle, and that at least one part of paradox III in Cicero’s Paradoxa Stoicorum appears to be defensible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cicero On Stoic Good and Evil. [REVIEW]Paul MacKendrick - 1994 - Ancient Philosophy 14 (2):463-465.
Cicero. De legibus. Paradoxa stoicorum. [REVIEW]Raymond Chevalier - 1997 - Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 75 (1):183-183.
The first Christian defender of stoic virtue? : Justus Lipsius and Cicero's Paradoxa stoicorum.Jan Papy - 2009 - In Arie Johan Vanderjagt, A. A. MacDonald, Z. R. W. M. von Martels & Jan R. Veenstra (eds.), Christian Humanism: Essays in Honour of Arjo Vanderjagt. Brill.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-05

Downloads
103 (#155,619)

6 months
12 (#122,295)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Rönnedal
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36 (3):602-605.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is.Graham Priest - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
First-order logic.Raymond Merrill Smullyan - 1968 - New York [etc.]: Springer Verlag.
A completeness theorem in modal logic.Saul Kripke - 1959 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (1):1-14.

View all 54 references / Add more references