Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):195-203 (2012)
AbstractAbstract I argue that embryonic stem cell research is fair to the embryo, even on the assumption that the embryo has attained full personhood and an attendant right to life at conception. This is because the only feasible alternatives open to the embryo are to exist briefly in an unconscious state and be killed or to not exist at all. Hence, one is neither depriving the embryo of an enduring life it would otherwise have had nor is one causing the embryo pain. I also argue that a rational agent in a situation relevantly similar to that of the embryo would consent to such research, and I use this insight to ground two justice-based arguments in favor of this research. Content Type Journal Article Category Original Research Pages 1-9 DOI 10.1007/s11673-012-9364-0 Authors Aaron Rizzieri, The Humanities Department (E-202), LaGuardia Community College, 31-10 Thompson Ave, Long Island City, NY 11101, USA Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind.Jerry A. Fodor - 1987 - MIT Press.
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory.David J. Chalmers - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Knowledge in an Uncertain World.Jeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath - 2009 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind.Paul M. Churchland (ed.) - 1984 - MIT Press.
Citations of this work
Signposts in a Familiar Land?: A Second Look at Lingering Bioethical Concerns.Michael A. Ashby & Leigh E. Rich - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):119-124.
Similar books and articles
Moral Complicity in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
Stem Cell Research: An Ethical Evaluation of Policy Options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.
Rescuing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: The Possibility of Embryo Reconstitution After Stem Cell Derivation.Katrien Devolder & Christopher M. Ward - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):245–263.
Stem Cell Research: Science, Ethics and the Popular Media.Karori Mbũgua - 2007 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 17 (1):5-10.
Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Pragmatic Roman Catholic's Defense.R. Whittington - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):235-251.
Stemming the Tide of Normalisation: An Expanded Feminist Analysis of the Ethics and Social Impact of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Shelley Tremain - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):33-42.
Are Human Embryos Kantian Persons?: Kantian Considerations in Favor of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Bertha Alvarez Manninen - 2008 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3:4.
Would the Real Human Embryonic Stem Cell Please Stand Up?Ben Zhang, Roman Krawetz & Derrick E. Rancourt - 2013 - Bioessays 35 (7):632-638.
Democracy, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and the Roman Catholic Church.J. Oakley - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):228-228.
International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) Guidelines for the Conduct of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (December 2006).Bernard Dickens - unknown
How to Depolarise the Ethical Debate Over Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (and Other Ethical Debates Too!).Nicolas Espinoza & Martin Peterson - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):496-500.
Embryonic Stem Cells: The Disagreement Debate and Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Israel.F. Simonstein - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):732-734.
Patently Controversial: Markets, Morals, and the President's Proposal for Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Joseph J. Fins & Madeleine Schachter - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):265-278.
Geron and the Demise of Embryonic Stem Cell Science.David van Gend - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (4):51.