A Study of Mathematical Determination through Bertrand’s Paradox

Philosophia Mathematica 26 (3):375-395 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Certain mathematical problems prove very hard to solve because some of their intuitive features have not been assimilated or cannot be assimilated by the available mathematical resources. This state of affairs triggers an interesting dynamic whereby the introduction of novel conceptual resources converts the intuitive features into further mathematical determinations in light of which a solution to the original problem is made accessible. I illustrate this phenomenon through a study of Bertrand’s paradox.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Mathematics of Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2006 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic. North Holland. pp. 615--648.
Defusing Bertrand’s Paradox.Zalán Gyenis & Rédei Miklós - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):349-373.
Bertrand Russell and the introduction of mathematical logic in China.Xu Yibao - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (3):181-196.
Mathematical nominalism and measurement.Davide Rizza - 2010 - Philosophia Mathematica 18 (1):53-73.
Achilles, the Tortoise, and Colliding Balls.Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2008 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (3):187 - 201.
A resolution of Bertrand's paradox.Louis Marinoff - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (1):1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
65 (#240,360)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Davide Rizza
University of East Anglia

References found in this work

The Well-Posed Problem.Edwin T. Jaynes - 1973 - Foundations of Physics 3 (4):477-493.
Defusing Bertrand’s Paradox.Zalán Gyenis & Miklós Rédei - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):349-373.

View all 12 references / Add more references