Probabilities in tragic choices

Utilitas 20 (3):323-333 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I explore a kind of tragic choice that has not received due attention, one in which you have to save only one of two persons but the probability of saving is not equal (and all other things are equal). Different proposals are assessed, taking as models proposals for a much more discussed tragic choice situation: saving different numbers of persons. I hold that cases in which (only) numbers are different are structurally similar to cases in which (only) probabilities are different. After a brief defense of this claim, I conclude that some version of consequentialism seems more promising for offering a plausible solution to the probability case

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#195,050)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Eduardo Rivera-López
Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz
Eduardo Lopez
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

Citations of this work

Should the probabilities count?Katharina Berndt Rasmussen - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):205-218.
Hierarchical consequentialism.Re'em Segev - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (3):309-330.
Risk, Calamity and Apology.Marko Ahteensuu - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (2):449-463.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Selecting people randomly.John Broome - 1984 - Ethics 95 (1):38-55.
Contractualism on saving the many.R. Kumar - 2001 - Analysis 61 (2):165-170.

View all 11 references / Add more references