March Madness

Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):141-150 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is at stake when students sell the highly sought-after basketball tickets they receive for free through a university’s lottery system? This article discusses a case in applied ethics taken from the experience of college students and extrapolates from that to the distribution of other scarce resources using lotteries. By examining an event relevant to the actual experience of students, we challenge them to see how normative moral theory may be used and what values are central to moral decision-making. The case includes four analyses from different perspectives and a teaching note

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

March madness: A case in applied ethics.Sally J. Scholz & Eric Riviello - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):141-150.
Moral madness.David Carr - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (2):103-125.
Should professional competence be taught as ethical?Douglas Birkhead - 1997 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (4):211 – 220.
Trauma and Truth: Representations of Madness in Chinese Literature.Birgit Linder - 2011 - Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (4):291-303.
Why Do College Students Cheat?Mark G. Simkin & Alexander McLeod - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3):441 - 453.
Teaching Goodness.Linnéa Franits - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):81-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
28 (#418,460)

6 months
1 (#448,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references