Justificationist social epistemology and critical thinking

Educational Theory 61 (5):565-585 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay Juho Ritola develops a justificationist approach to social epistemology, which holds that normatively satisfactory social processes pertaining to the acquisition, storage, dissemination, and use of knowledge must be evidence-based processes that include appropriate reflective attitudes by the relevant agents and, consequently, the relevant institutions. This implies that the teaching of critical thinking and reasoning in general should strive to bring about such attitudes in students. Ritola begins by sketching a justificationist approach and defending it on a general level against the criticism posed by Alvin Goldman. He then defends it on the level of individual reasoners against the argument set out by Michael Bishop and J.D. Trout. Based on empirical evidence, Bishop and Trout argue that the kind of reflection advocated by a justificationist approach to reasoning leads to worse outcomes than the use of various statistical prediction rules. Ritola, in contrast, maintains that one cannot and should not replace critical reflection on evidence by a mechanical application of rules. Instead, he asserts, statistical prediction rules and empirical evidence regarding our reasoning performance are part of the total evidence that we should reflect on in our critical reasoning

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment.Michael A. Bishop & J. D. Trout - 2004 - New York: OUP USA. Edited by J. D. Trout.
Critical Thinking is Epistemically Responsible.Juho Ritola - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):659-678.
Learning, Critical Thinking, and Confucius.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:79-84.
The vocabulary of critical thinking.Phil Washburn - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A justificationist view of disagreement’s epistemic significance.Jennifer Lackey - 2008 - In Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 145-154.
Critical Thinking.Robert Ennis - 1991 - Teaching Philosophy 14 (1):4-18.
Critical reasoning, understanding and self-knowledge.Jessica Brown - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):659-676.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-21

Downloads
36 (#456,958)

6 months
5 (#710,646)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Juho Ritola
University of Turku

Citations of this work

Critical Thinking is Epistemically Responsible.Juho Ritola - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):659-678.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references