From morality to metaphysics: the theistic implications of our ethical commitments

Oxford: Oxford University Press (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Part I: The 'explanatory gap'. 1. Why take morality to be objective? -- 2. The gap opens: evolution and our capacity for moral knowledge -- Part II: Secular responses. 3. Alternatives to realism: Simon Blackburn and Allan Gibbard -- 4. Procedures and reasons: Tim Scanlon and Christine Korsgaard -- 5. Natural goodness: Philippa Foot's moral objectivism -- 6. Natural goodness and 'second nature': John McDowell and David Wiggin -- Part III: Theism. 7. From goodness to God: closing the explanatory gap -- 8. Purpose without theism? Axiarchism and Neoplatonism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-29

Downloads
65 (#243,968)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Angus Ritchie
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Theism and Secular Modality.Noah Gordon - 2023 - Dissertation, University of Southern California
Determining the Need for Explanation.Martin Jakobsen - 2020 - Faith and Philosophy 37 (2):230-241.
Religious Disagreement, Religious Experience, and the Evil God Hypothesis.Kirk Lougheed - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (1):173-190.
From Moral Realism to Axiarchism.Brian Cutter - 2023 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 47:73-101.
Moral arguments for the existence of God.Peter Byrne - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references