Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-making Process in Business Students

Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):153-164 (2006)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the various guidelines presented in the literature for instituting an ethics curriculum and to empirically study their effectiveness. Three questions are addressed concerning the trainability of ethics material and the proper integration and implementation of an ethics curriculum. An empirical study then tested the effect of ethics training on moral awareness and reasoning. The sample consisted of two business classes, one exposed to additional ethics curriculum (experimental), and one not exposed (control). For the experimental group, ethics exercises and discussion relevant to each topic were completed. Findings suggested gender differences such that, relative to other groups, women in the experimental group showed significantly improved moral awareness and decision-making processes. An explanation of the underlying cognitive processes is presented to explain the gender effect

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
102 (#117,799)

6 months
1 (#388,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different? [REVIEW]Dawn R. Elm & Tara J. Radin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):313-329.
Ethical Decision Making and the Law.Barbara Libby & Vincent Agnello - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (3):223 - 232.
Business Ethics Training Using ‘The Difficult Hiring Decision’ Case: Lessons Learned.Mark S. Schwartz - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:541-544.
Business Ethics and the Brain.Rommel Salvador & Robert G. Folger - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (1):1-31.