‘Am I That Name?’: Feminism and the Category of ‘Women’ in History

Springer (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Writing about changes in the notion of womanhood, Denise Riley examines, in the manner of Foucault, shifting historical constructions of the category of "women" in relation to other categories central to concepts of personhood: the soul, the mind, the body, nature, the social. Feminist movements, Riley argues, have had no choice but to play out this indeterminacy of women. This is made plain in their oscillations, since the 1790s, between concepts of equality and of difference. To fully recognize the ambiguity of the category of "women" is, she contends, a necessary condition for an effective feminist political philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
1,847 (#4,918)

6 months
21 (#122,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Él / Ella / They / Ze.Robin Dembroff & Daniel Wodak - 2023 - In Patricia Ruiz Bravo & Aranxa Pizarro (eds.), Pensando el género : lecturas contemporáneas. pp. 149-169. Translated by Aranxa Pizarro & Eloy Neira Riquelme.
BELIEVING IS SEEING:: Biology as Ideology.Judith Lorber - 1993 - Gender and Society 7 (4):568-581.

View all 45 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references